Evidence labels
| Label | Meaning | Display |
|---|---|---|
| [V] | Verified at source during the research pass | State the source and date |
| [R] | Reported by a credible secondary source | Attribute it clearly |
| [VC] | Vendor claim not independently checked | Never present as a neutral result |
| [C] | Sources conflict | Show both and resolve later |
What needs rechecking first
AI and model claims
Fastest-decaying section. Capability, studio adoption, disclosure, and licensing statements require current primary sources.
Software pricing
The research found multiple pricing and packaging changes inside twelve months. A number without a checked date is not useful.
License terms
Output use, free tiers, attribution, and commercial rights matter more than the sticker price when a file travels downstream.
Industry status
Organizations, societies, and tool vendors can change status. Preserve the check date and the source page.
Known gaps
- Practitioner interviews for rates and engagement data.
- Full guild reports behind the taxonomy anchor.
- Independent archviz rate data.
- Current status of the Previsualization Society.
A source-backed article does not make the artifact described reliable. The page still needs its own decision class and authority record.
Synthesized from the supplied README and all nine research passes. Research dates remain separate from any future site publication date.